MSNBC loses the peacock: Keys to change

In the media world, a brand’s identity is its most valuable asset. Therefore, the news that the cable news network MSNBC would change its name to “My Source News Opinion World,” abbreviated as MS NOW, and abandon its iconic peacock logo, resonated like an earthquake in the industry.¹This is not a simple cosmetic redesign; it is a fundamental metamorphosis, a reinvention forced by the tectonic plates of corporate strategy. Far from being a proactive marketing maneuver to conquer new markets, MSNBC’s rebranding is a reactive and unavoidable consequence of a massive corporate restructuring. This analysis will dissect this move as a high-stakes case study of the collision between financial strategy, brand identity, accumulated brand equity, and public perception in the volatile media landscape of the 21st century.

The central thesis of this report is that the change to MS NOW shouldn’t be judged by the same criteria as a traditional rebranding. Most high-profile brand transformations are proactive: they seek to modernize an outdated image, overcome a reputational crisis, or expand into new demographic or geographic territories.⁴The case of MSNBC is radically different. The change was not a choice to optimize the brand, but a contractual obligation arising from its corporate spinoff from NBCUniversal.⁷The executives’ statements, which frame the transition as an “opportunity to chart our own path”⁸, are an exercise in corporate communications designed to present a necessity as a virtue. The genesis of MS NOW lies not in a marketing boardroom, but in the legal and financial firms that orchestrated the separation. Therefore, an analysis of its success or failure must consider how the new entity, Versant, manages a top-down transformation, with all the attendant drawbacks.

The setting is dramatic: a cable news network with a well-defined liberal identity and a loyal audience built over nearly three decades.¹⁰, is forced, overnight, to shed its name and most recognizable symbol to forge a new identity from scratch. It’s a monumental gamble that tests the limits of audience loyalty and the fundamental principles of modern branding.

The End of an Era: The Corporate Separation That Forced Change

The catalyst for this radical transformation was a large-scale corporate move. Comcast, the parent company of NBCUniversal, announced its intention to spin off a significant portfolio of its cable assets into a new, publicly traded company, dubbed Versant.⁷This new entity would bring together networks such as USA Network, CNBC, MSNBC, E! Entertainment, Oxygen, and the Golf Channel.¹⁵The logic behind this decision is a common financial strategy in the era of

cord-cutting: to isolate cable TV assets, which are facing long-term structural decline, from Comcast’s core, faster-growing businesses, such as broadband, Universal Studios, and, crucially, the Peacock streaming service.¹⁴

Included in the terms of this separation was a critical clause that sealed the fate of the MSNBC brand. NBCUniversal made the strategic decision to retain exclusive ownership of the “NBC” brand and its most valuable visual asset: the iconic peacock logo. This symbol, originally introduced in 1956 to promote color programming, has become synonymous with NBC’s heritage and authority in broadcasting.¹⁸Versant CEO Mark Lazarus made this clear in an internal memo: “The peacock is synonymous with NBCUniversal, and it’s a symbol they’ve chosen to maintain within the NBCU family.”⁸

This decision wasn’t arbitrary, but rather a cold-blooded asset valuation calculation. In a divestiture process, a brand is one of the most important intangible assets. Comcast and NBCUniversal concluded that the value of the “NBC” brand and the Peacock were greater if they were consolidated exclusively with their core and growth operations, rather than diluting their power by licensing them to the new cable entity. By stripping Versant of these brand assets, they maximized the value of what they retained, even if this deliberately weakened the new company’s foundation.

The domino effect was immediate and inevitable. For a network whose name, “MSNBC,” literally included the initials of its parent company, change was not an option, but an obligation. The corporate separation forced all Versant entities to purge any visual or nominal association with NBC. Thus, the MS NOW rebranding was born not from a marketing vision, but as an externality of a broader financial strategy. Versant began its public life with a branding disadvantage imposed by its former parent company, a formidable challenge from day one.

The Strategy Behind “MS NOW”: Independence, Mission, and the Quest for Clarity

Faced with inevitable change, Versant and the new MS NOW leadership strove to build a narrative of opportunity and empowerment. The official message, articulated by key executives, focused on independence and clarity of purpose. Versant CEO Mark Lazarus framed the transition as a unique opportunity to “chart our own path, create distinctive brand identities, and establish an independent news organization.”⁸For her part, MSNBC president Rebecca Kutler, while acknowledging the emotional difficulty of the change for staff and viewers (“it’s hard to imagine the network with another name”), presented it as a platform to “set our own course and assert our independence.”⁸A crucial point in their communication was the assurance that, despite the new name, the editorial mission and commitment to its progressive audience would not change at all.³

The new name, “My Source News Opinion World,” is in itself a statement of intent.¹Instead of an evocative or abstract name, the company opted for a mission statement, a descriptive approach that literally explains what the chain offers. This “tell, don’t show” strategy is often considered less sophisticated in the branding world, but in this case, it has a clear strategic objective: to resolve the “brand confusion” that executives said had long existed.¹³For years, there was an inherent tension between the more traditional and objective journalism of NBC News and the markedly liberal opinion programming of MSNBC in prime time.¹²The new name seeks to draw a clear line in the sand, positioning MS NOW as a dedicated destination for analysis and opinion, in addition to news.

To support this new identity, Versant announced a significant investment. The name change isn’t just a fresh coat of paint; it’s accompanied by the construction of an entirely new newsgathering operation independent of NBC News. This includes the hiring of nearly 100 new professionals and the establishment of the network’s first Washington, D.C., bureau, recruiting journalists from outlets such as CNN, Bloomberg, and Politico.³In addition, a massive national marketing campaign, described as “unlike anything we’ve done in recent memory,” was promised to introduce and cement the new brand in the public’s mind.²This significant investment demonstrates that, although the change was forced, the new company is committed to giving MS NOW the resources it needs to compete.

Make your brand tell a unique story Download here

The Peacock Dilemma: Calculating the Cost of Abandoning Brand Equity

The decision to abandon the “MSNBC” name and the peacock logo is one of the riskiest branding moves in recent media history. These elements represented nearly 30 years of brand equity: the recognition, familiarity, and associations (both positive and negative) built in the minds of millions of viewers. The peacock, in particular, is not a simple graphic; it’s a symbol steeped in history, representing power, confidence, and a broadcasting legacy that dates back to the dawn of color television.¹⁸Discarding such a powerful asset is a decision with an immense cost that is difficult to quantify.

Marketing theory and academic research warn of the dangers of such radical transformations. Studies suggest that drastic brand changes can have a particularly negative impact on the most engaged and loyal customers.²³These consumers often develop a strong emotional attachment to a brand’s existing identity. For them, an abrupt change may be perceived not as an evolution, but as a betrayal or a loss of something they considered their own, which can lead to alienation and rejection.

A deeper analysis of Versant’s strategy reveals that the treatment of MSNBC was not a blanket policy, but rather part of a differentiated, risk-based rebranding approach across its entire portfolio of brands. Not all networks received the same treatment, demonstrating a nuanced case-by-case calculation.

This differentiated strategy is not inconsistent, but rather intelligent risk management. In the case ofCNBCThe network kept its name despite losing the peacock. The reason was pragmatic and financial: CNBC has “long-term licensing agreements” with partners around the world that contractually obligate it to use that name.⁸The legal and financial costs of breaking or renegotiating those contracts were prohibitively high, far outweighing the benefits of complete brand consistency within Versant. Therefore, the change was limited to the logo.

ForUSA Network and the Golf ChannelThe logic behind this was synergy and consolidation. Merging the two under a new umbrella brand, “USA Sports,” creates a stronger, more coherent content destination for sports fans, optimizing assets and simplifying the value proposition for viewers and advertisers.⁸

MSNBCrepresented the most extreme case. The brand conflict with its former corporate sibling, NBC News, was the most acute, and the same international contractual barriers that protected CNBC didn’t exist. Therefore, it was the logical candidate for the most radical treatment. The potential benefit of clear and complete differentiation was deemed to outweigh the risk of abandoning existing brand equity. The decision, although drastic, was the result of a strategic calculation that weighed the costs, risks, and opportunities for each asset in Versant’s new portfolio.

The Battle for Perception: When Your New Name Becomes a Meme

While the corporate strategy behind the change was logical, the execution of the marketing and communications at its launch was problematic, to say the least. The announcement of the “MS NOW” name was met with a wave of criticism, ridicule, and widespread skepticism on social media and among media commentators.²⁴This immediate negative reaction represents a significant failure in the launch phase and offers a lesson in the importance of perception auditing in branding.

Analysis of the criticisms reveals several fundamental flaws:

Unwanted Associations

The most obvious mistake was the failure to anticipate the immediate negative associations that the acronym “MS” would evoke in the public.

• “MS” and Multiple Sclerosis:For many people, their first reading of “MS NOW” was not a news acronym, but an unfortunate and disturbing slogan related to neurological disease.²⁶In patient communities, forums, and charities, “MS” is the universally accepted term for multiple sclerosis, which made the choice of name seem insensitive and poorly researched.²⁷
• “MS” y Microsoft:Although MSNBC’s original partnership with Microsoft ended more than a decade ago³The “MS” prefix remains indelibly linked to the Microsoft brand in the collective consciousness. This created unnecessary confusion, with many users wondering if the tech giant was somehow involved again, or simply perceiving the name as an anachronistic echo of the past.²⁶

Design and Tone Critique

Beyond the associations, the name and logo were widely criticized for being generic, corporate, and lacking the gravitas and prestige expected of a major news network. Comments such as the logo looked like it “came from a 1998 discount computer” were received.²⁴or that the name sounded like “a PowerPoint presentation where the custom font isn’t recognized”²⁶They illustrate a perceived lack of quality and creativity. This aesthetic, perceived as “cheap” or “soulless,” directly undermines the goal of establishing a credible, “independent news organization.”

Internal Confusion

Perhaps the most telling indicator of the new name’s lack of resonance came from the network’s own star, Rachel Maddow. In public statements, she admitted to having “no idea how to pronounce ‘MS NOW.'”³¹When a brand’s most important figure is unsure of how to articulate its new identity, it’s a sure sign that the message hasn’t been effectively communicated or conceived.

This public reaction didn’t occur in a vacuum. It reflects a broader cynicism and preexisting distrust of large media corporations. Rather than interpreting the change as an exciting new beginning, a significant portion of the audience saw it as a superficial “stunt,” an inauthentic move engineered by a corporate committee disconnected from reality.²⁶In a climate of trust, a mediocre name might be ignored; in a climate of cynicism, it becomes further evidence of the institution’s lack of authenticity. MS NOW’s marketing task, therefore, is not just to popularize a new name, but to overcome a deep barrier of skepticism to demonstrate its value and authenticity.

Conclusion: A Risky Bet with a Future to Be Written

The rebranding of MSNBC to MS NOW chronicles an inevitable collision: a logical and defensible corporate necessity (the spinoff of Versant) executed through a flawed branding and launch strategy. It was a move forced by circumstances, but the execution was clumsy, and its initial problems, like the negative associations of the name, were entirely foreseeable. The story of MS NOW encapsulates the tension between the financial logic of a boardroom and the complex alchemy of public perception.

Several key lessons for marketing and brand strategy professionals emerge from this case study:

1. The Danger of Impersonal Branding:A name that sounds like it was designed by a legal or financial committee, like “My Source News Opinion World,” rarely achieves the emotional resonance needed to connect with an audience. The strongest brands are evocative, not merely descriptive.
2. The Critical Need for an External Perception Audit:The failure to anticipate negative associations with “MS” (Multiple Sclerosis, Microsoft) is a clear indicator of a lack of rigorous market research. Standard processes such asfocus groupsor perception surveys would have identified these issues immediately, allowing for course adjustment before public launch.³²
3. Brand Equity is a Fragile and Valuable Asset:Discarding nearly three decades of brand recognition is a monumental decision. The new brand must offer a huge, clear, and compelling value proposition to justify such a loss. The value of familiarity and history should never be underestimated.

Ultimately, the long-term success or failure of MS NOW will not depend on the name itself. The history of branding is littered with initially ridiculed names that, over time, became iconic thanks to the quality of the product they represented. The network’s future will depend on two critical factors. First, its ability to deliver on the promise of high-quality news and opinion journalism that not only retains its core audience but also demonstrates the value of its new editorial independence. Second, the success of the promised “significant” national marketing campaign.⁸This campaign has the Herculean task of building new meaning and an emotional connection around the “MS NOW” brand, overcoming the initial wave of ridicule and establishing a distinct, respected, and, above all, relevant identity in the fragmented media ecosystem of the future. The bet is placed; the future of MS NOW is yet to be written.

Protect Your Brand Equity: Master Your Social Narrative

The MSNBC/MS NOW disaster shows that a fundamental change, even if forced, demands flawless execution and an awareness of public perception on social media. Don’t let a “corporate” mistake turn your brand into a meme.

GGyess Social Suite gives you the control and planning tools to manage high-stakes brand transitions and communications:

• Perception Auditing: Monitor social feedback and audience sentiment instantly to identify and address negative associations before they go viral.
• Controlled Launch: Plan and schedule a massive, coordinated content campaign across all channels to build positive meaning around your new narrative.
• Consistency Across Eras: Maintain a unified, professional voice and tone during and after any major change to reassure your loyal audience.

Register to Master Your Brand’s Next Big Transition Today.

Start Protecting Your Brand’s Narrative with GGyess Social Suite

Sources cited

1. MSNBC will change its name this year after corporately separating from NBC, accessed: August 18, 2025,https://apnews.com/article/msnbc-ms-now-cambio-de-nombre-daa01318a4fdfd0a821312802d6cb09b
2. Major US network unveils new name | The Independent, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/culture/msnbc-name-change-ms-now-news-b2809651.html
3. MSNBC ditches NBC and iconic Peacock logo, set to get new name …, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/us/msnbc-ditches-nbc-and-iconic-peacock-image-set-to-get-new-name-details-here-101755528292459.html
4. What is rebranding and how can you apply it (with examples), accessed: August 18, 2025,https://www.lucushost.com/blog/rebranding/
5. What is rebranding and when to use it? 5 inspiring examples – ThePowerMBA, accessed August 18, 2025https://www.thepowermba.com/es/blog/que-es-el-rebranding
6. What is rebranding and how it affects your business in 2023…, accessed: August 18, 2025,https://mailchimp.com/es/resources/rebranding-your-business/
7. MSNBC to change name this year after corporate separation from NBC – Network 3, access: August 18, 2025,https://www.cadena3.com/noticia/mundo/msnbc-cambiara-su-nombre-este-ano-tras-separarse-corporativamente-de-nbc_455430
8. Versant to Rebrand MSNBC as MS NOW: My Source for News, Opinion and the World, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.thewrap.com/versant-rebrand-msnbc-name-change-ms-now-cnbc-usa-sports/
9. Cable network MSNBC to rebrand as MS NOW after split from NBCUniversal – SWI swissinfo.ch, accessed August 18, 2025,https://www.swissinfo.ch/spa/la-cadena-de-cable-msnbc-cambiar%C3%A1-su-nombre-a-ms-now-tras-separarse-de-nbcuniversal/89854761
10. MSNBC to change name as part of corporate separation from NBC, accessed August 18, 2025https://www.elnuevodia.com/noticias/estados-unidos/notas/msnbc-cambiara-su-nombre-como-parte-de-la-separacion-corporativa-de-nbc/
11. Breaking news and information on Yahoo! Spanish, accessed August 18, 2025.https://es-us.noticias.yahoo.com/
12. Cable’s MSNBC will change its name later this year as part of corporate divorce from NBC – Virginia Business, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, http://virginiabusiness.com/msnbc-rebrands-as-ms-now-splits-from-nbc/
13. MSNBC to rebrand as “MS NOW” in Comcast spinoff deal, accessed August 18, 2025https://noticias.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-change-name-ms-now-comcast-spinoff-deal
14. Comcast’s cable spinoff to be named Versant : r/television – Reddit, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/television/comments/1kgh47o/comcasts_cable_spinoff_to_be_named_versant/
15. MSNBC Is Rebranding As MS NOW – Vulture, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.vulture.com/article/msnbc-name-change-ms-now-explained.html
16. MSNBC to change name to ‘MS NOW’ in Comcast spinoff deal – Fox News, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-change-name-ms-now-comcast-spinoff-deal
17. MSNBC to rebrand as MS NOW, drops peacock logo in spinoff from NBC, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://san.com/cc/msnbc-to-rebrand-as-ms-now-drops-peacock-logo-in-spinoff-from-nbc/
18. The Symbolism of Peacocks – Phoenix Art Museum, accessed August 18, 2025https://phxart.org/es/blog/el-simbolismo-de-los-pavos-reales/
19. What do you think of the new NBC Peacock logo? : r/logodesign – Reddit, accessed August 18, 2025https://www.reddit.com/r/logodesign/comments/18a8uk2/whats_your_thoughts_on_the_new_nbc_peacock/?tl=es-es
20. Versant to Rebrand MSNBC to MS Now: My Source for News, Opinion and the World, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://ca.news.yahoo.com/versant-rebrand-msnbc-ms-now-131000815.html
21. MSNBC morphing into MS NOW, as it splits from NBC News – Consumer Affairs, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/msnbc-morphing-into-ms-now-as-it-splits-from-nbc-news-081825.html
22. MSNBC to ditch its name and iconic peacock logo — say hello to MS Now this year, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/msnbc-name-change-msnbc-to-ditch-its-name-and-iconic-peacock-logo-say-hello-to-ms-now-this-year/articleshow/123365975.cms
23. (PDF) Do Logo Redesigns Help or Hurt Your Brand? The Role of Brand Commitment, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228137545_Do_Logo_Redesigns_Help_or_Hurt_Your_Brand_The_Role_of_Brand_Commitment
24. MSNBC Rebrand to MS NOW Mocked Online – Newsweek, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/msnbc-rebrand-ms-now-mocked-online-2115112
25. MSNBC becomes MS NOW after NBCUniversal split – Broadband TV News, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2025/08/18/msnbc-becomes-ms-now-after-nbcuniversal-split/
26. MSNBC is changing its name to MS NOW (short for My Source for …, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/popculturechat/comments/1mtlju6/msnbc_is_changing_its_name_to_ms_now_short_for_my/
27. What makes you not want to tell people about your diagnosis? : r/MultipleSclerosis – Reddit, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/MultipleSclerosis/comments/10r5juy/what_makes_you_not_want_to_tell_people_about_your/
28. Weekly Suspected/Undiagnosed MS Thread – February 06, 2023 : r/MultipleSclerosis, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/MultipleSclerosis/comments/10v3uj0/weekly_suspectedundiagnosed_ms_thread_february_06/
29. IAmA 18 year old female whose mother has Multiple Sclerosis. I was also diagnosed with the disease four years ago. AMA – Reddit, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1473zz/iama_18_year_old_female_whose_mother_has_multiple/
30. Research Show Immune System Bacteria Link to MS – Multiple Sclerosis News Today, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://multiplesclerosisnewstoday.com/2018/07/11/ms-evidence-bacteria-immune-system/
31. Rachel Maddow Has ‘No Idea How to Pronounce’ MSNBC’s New Name – The Daily Beast, acceso: agosto 18, 2025, https://www.thedailybeast.com/rachel-maddow-has-no-idea-how-to-pronounce-msnbcs-new-name/
32. Rebranding: How to Create a Successful Strategy – Shopify, accessed August 18, 2025,https://www.shopify.com/es/blog/rebranding